Yank Tanks to the Side: Time to Shop Like a True Blue Aussie!

 G'day, Aussies! It's fair to say that the recent shenanigans with our mates across the Pacific have left a few of us feeling like a snag short of a barbie. When Uncle Sam slaps tariffs on our exports, it's a wake-up call to have a good hard look at where our own hard-earned cash is headed.. Did you know that last year, we Aussies sent almost $50 billion to America for their stuff?. That's a fair chunk of change that could be stayin' right here, supportin' our own legends and battlers!.

Now, we're not sayin' to chuck out your iPhone (though some are considerin' it!), but when we've got a choice, let's make it a ripper of a local one.. Think about it – supportin' Aussie farmers, manufacturers, and businesses not only keeps our economy strong and diverse, but it also means we're enjoyin' top-notch, home-grown goodness.

But how do you know which brands are wearin' the stars and stripes under their Akubra? It can be trickier than findin' a park at Bondi on a sunny Saturday! Luckily, there are some clever tools out there to help you navigate the supermarket aisles and the online jungle.

Your Weaponry in the War Against Unnecessary Imports:

Forget squinting at tiny labels – these mobile apps are your new best mates when you're out and about:

•

Boycott X: This handy app lets you scan product barcodes to see if the brand or company is on any boycott lists. It's designed to help you make more ethical and sustainable choices based on various concerns. You can even see the country of origin instantly. It also allows you to browse boycott categories and see which companies are involved. Plus, you can keep track of your scan history and even see stats on the origins of the products you've scanned. Some users find it "perfect for everyday shopping" and "super practical". Keep an eye out for updates that include personal statistics on your ethical impact and community group features.

Android: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.webnova.boycott

iOS: https://apps.apple.com/in/app/boycott-x/id6473090034

•

Boycott America: As the name suggests, this app focuses specifically on identifyin' American-made products by scanning barcodes. It uses a community-powered approach, where users can verify and vote on product information to improve accuracy.

Android: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=ca.proudlybuyingcanadian.boycottamerica&pcampaignid=web_share

iOS: https://apps.apple.com/ca/app/boycott-america/id6742726022

•

No Thanks: This app simplifies the process of scanning barcodes to identify products listed for boycott movements. It aims to make your shopping easier by tellin' you which brands you might want to avoid. You can also search by serial number.

Android: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.bashsoftware.boycott&pcampaignid=web_share

iOS: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/no-thanks-app/id6476206516

And when you're online or want the bigger picture, these websites are worth bookmarking:

•

Australian Made: This is your go-to for findin' genuine Australian products. They handpick Aussie-made products for every occasion, makin' it easier to support local makers.

https://australianmade.com.au/products/

•

Lyrebird Dreaming (lyrebirddreaming.com): Gregory Andrews has put together a list of 10 big American companies to boycott beyond the supermarket, highlighting reasons to avoid them, such as exploitin' workers, dodgin' taxes, and fundin' political extremism. You can also find related reads like "20 American Supermarket Products to Avoid – And What to Buy Instead". Here's a couple of his posts:

https://www.lyrebirddreaming.com/post/us-fast-food-boycott-and-what-to-eat-instead

https://www.lyrebirddreaming.com/post/10-us-companies-to-avoid-beyond-the-supermarket-and-what-to-use-instead

It's Not About Being Un-American, It's About Bein' Smart!

This isn't about holdin' grudges or throwin' a tanty. It's about makin' informed choices that benefit us here at home. When we choose Aussie-made, we're investin' in our communities, creating jobs, and buildin' a more resilient economy. Plus, many Aussies reckon our local gear is top-notch anyway!.

Time to Take Action, Ya Mugs!

So, what are you waitin' for? Chuck these apps on your phone and bookmark those websites. Next time you're doin' the grocery run or clickin' "add to cart," take a sec to see where your money's goin'.

Let's make it our unofficial national duty to give Aussie businesses a fair shake. Share this post with your mates and family. Drop a comment below with your favourite Aussie alternatives to American products.

Every little bit helps. Let's show the world what it means to be a true blue, savvy shopper!

David Adler: A Principled Voice or a Divisive Force in Australian Politics?

 In the vibrant landscape of Australian political discourse, few figures have generated as much discussion within the Jewish community and beyond as Dr. David Adler, the long-standing President of the Australian Jewish Association (AJA). Established in 2017, the AJA, under Adler's leadership, has positioned itself as a centre-right conservative organisation providing a self-proclaimed "principled voice" grounded in Torah values and unwavering support for Israel. But who is David Adler, and what are the politically charged connections that define his and the AJA's influence?

A medical graduate from the University of New South Wales with over 35 years of experience and a former Deputy Medical Secretary of the Australian Medical Association (AMA), Adler stepped into the political arena with the formation of the AJA. The organisation emerged from a sentiment within a segment of the Jewish community that felt existing bodies were "drifting away from important values" by becoming too politically left-leaning and embracing "woke causes". Adler articulated that many in the community desired a "more principled voice, a stronger voice, a clearer voice".

A Strong Conservative Voice:

True to its founding principles, the AJA, under Adler's guidance, has become an outspoken voice on a range of politically sensitive issues. A central tenet of their advocacy is an unyielding support for Israel as the Jewish homeland. This stance informs much of their political engagement, including their strong opposition to Australian funding for UNRWA, which they vehemently label a "terrorists Factory". Adler has actively campaigned against this funding, citing concerns about Hamas's integration within the agency and incitement in its educational materials. Their efforts have seen some success, with Australia halving its UNRWA contributions.

Domestically, Adler and the AJA have consistently advocated for the formal adoption of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of antisemitism in Australia, viewing it as a crucial tool in combating rising antisemitism. Adler himself has actively lobbied parliamentarians on this issue. Furthermore, the AJA is a vocal proponent of free speech, aligning with conservative principles in opposing restrictions like section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act. Adler has also been critical of what he perceives as a "woke" agenda, questioning topics such as the teaching of "gender fluidity" in schools.

Connections to the Right Wing:

The AJA's conservative ideology has naturally led to connections with various right-wing entities within the Australian political landscape. The organisation was "quickly welcomed by the political centre-right and conservative side". Adler is a member of the Advisory Council for Advance Australia, a prominent conservative activist group that played a significant role in the campaign against the Indigenous Voice to Parliament. This connection places Adler within a network that includes figures like former Liberal Prime Minister Tony Abbott, a strategic advisor to Advance Australia.

The AJA also maintains "good relationships with many leading think tanks", with the Institute of Public Affairs (IPA) and the Centre for Independent Studies (CIS) being identified as ideological allies. These think tanks are significant players in shaping conservative policy in Australia and have been linked to the US-based Atlas Network, a global network of free-market think tanks. While direct links between Adler or the AJA and the Atlas Network aren't explicitly detailed, the alignment of their conservative principles and connections to Atlas-affiliated organisations like Advance Australia, IPA, and CIS suggest an indirect association.

Furthermore, Adler and the AJA actively engage with conservative media outlets such as Sky News Australia and The Spectator Magazine, with Adler himself being a frequent commentator. He has also spoken at events like CPAC Australia, a conference that draws conservative figures, further solidifying his connections within these circles.

Navigating the Political Landscape:

The AJA's political leanings are evident in its engagement with political parties. They seem to have a close alignment with the Liberal National Party (LNP), with Adler and the AJA maintaining "good relationships with many senators and members of parliament". Adler has personally met with numerous parliamentarians to advocate for the AJA's policy positions. Conversely, the AJA has been a vocal critic of the Australian Labor Party (ALP), particularly regarding its stance on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, accusing them of moving towards the "Corbynization" of the party and embracing "Palestinian terror". They have also openly attacked other political parties like the Greens, accusing them of being terrorist supporters.

Potential Links to Hasbara:

Given the AJA's strong pro-Israel advocacy, conservative political alignment, and active media engagement, some sources suggest a potential alignment with or association with Hasbara, the strategic communications effort by the Israeli government and its supporters to shape public opinion in favour of Israel. While the sources don't provide evidence of direct formal links or funding from Israeli government entities, the AJA's objectives and tactics resonate with the broader goals of Hasbara. One source explicitly labels the AJA as associated with "hasbara".

Hasbara's Impact on Australian Politics and Society

The sources suggest that Hasbara is having a detrimental effect on Australian politics and social cohesion. Some of the key impacts include:

1

Foreign Interference: Pro-Israel lobby groups, some of which are publicly funded charities, are accused of acting as agents of foreign interference in Australia. These groups are also accused of attacking Australian political parties for not supporting Israel enough.

2

Demonization Tactics: Hasbara tactics include demonizing Muslims, Arabs, and particularly Palestinians, as well as anyone who supports peace or criticizes the Israeli government.

3

Media Influence: The mainstream media is accused of being "cowed" into accepting the hasbara narrative or running with it for its own political agendas, thereby failing to investigate the issue effectively.

4

Division of the Jewish Community: Many Jewish Australians oppose the actions of Zionist groups and their hasbara tactics, but their voices are often drowned out by the "cacophony of whining victimhood" coming from these organisations].

5

Lobbying and Political Activity: Some charities are accused of engaging in political lobbying, which is against the rules of the Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission. The Australian Jewish Association (AJA), for example, is identified as a charity that openly attacks political parties, and seems closely linked to the LNP. David Adler (who has been President), for example:

David Adler and Tony Abbott: Advance backers: Adler (AJA) and LNP involved in QLD: Other interactions: One interesting quote includes; "Australia/Israel & Jewish Affairs Council national chairman Mark Leibler, a prominent Indigenous rights activist who co-chaired the Referendum Council, said that due to the AJA’s “misleading name”, it is very important for people within the Jewish community, but also people outside the Jewish community, to “understand that this organisation and this person, they do not speak for us”."

Controversies and Criticisms:

Despite its prominent voice, the AJA and Dr. Adler are not without controversy. Their hardline stances have led to them being labelled "extremist" by mainstream Jewish organisations like the Executive Council of Australian Jewry (ECAJ) and the Australia Israel Jewish Affairs Council (AIJAC). Prominent figures within the Jewish community, such as Mark Leibler, have publicly stated that Adler and the AJA "do not speak for us". Adler has also faced criticism for controversial comments regarding Indigenous Australians. Furthermore, the AJA's focus and methods have created tensions within the Australian Jewish community, with mainstream organisations distancing themselves.

Conclusion:

Dr. David Adler, through his leadership of the Australian Jewish Association, has carved out a significant and often contentious space within Australian politics. Driven by a strong conservative ideology and an unwavering commitment to Israel, he and the AJA have become influential voices on issues ranging from antisemitism and foreign policy to domestic social debates. Their connections to right-wing think tanks, political figures, and media outlets highlight their active role in shaping the conservative side of the Australian political spectrum. However, their hardline positions and controversial statements have also made them a divisive force, drawing criticism from within and outside the Jewish community. As Australian politics continues to evolve, the role and influence of Dr. David Adler and the Australian Jewish Association should be monitored and scrutinised.

Sources: https://www.auspol.info/2025/01/is-foreign-interference-undermining.html

Project 2025: What a US Policy Blueprint Means for Your Vote in the 2025 Australian Election

 Fellow Australians, as we gear up for the 2025 Federal election, it's crucial we look beyond our shores to understand global forces that could significantly impact our lives. One such force is "Project 2025," a comprehensive policy blueprint developed by conservative organisations in the United States, spearheaded by The Heritage Foundation. While it's an American initiative, its potential flow-on effects for Australia are too significant to ignore.

Project 2025 outlines a radical conservative vision for a future US presidential administration, aiming to reshape everything from environmental regulations to international alliances. As our closest ally, the US's policy direction has a tangible impact on Australia's security, economy, and environment. Understanding Project 2025 is understanding a potential future that could directly affect your vote in 2025.

Our Environment at Risk: Project 2025's Climate Change Denial

Australia is on the front lines of climate change, facing increasing extreme weather events, rising sea levels, and threats to our beloved Great Barrier Reef Project 2025's approach to the environment is deeply concerning. It proposes a significant reversal of climate initiatives and environmental protections in the US, prioritising fossil fuel development above all else.

This isn't just a US issue; it's a global one. If the US, a major global emitter, abandons climate action, it undermines global efforts to combat climate change. This makes it harder for Australia to achieve its own climate goals and exacerbates the environmental challenges facing our Pacific neighbours.

Imagine a world where the US rolls back regulations, expands Arctic drilling, and even denies the harm caused by carbon dioxide emissions. This would weaken the international drive for ambitious climate action, leaving Australia more vulnerable to the devastating impacts of a warming planet. The potential US withdrawal from the Paris Agreement under Project 2025 would further cripple the international cooperation ..

Your vote in 2025 is a vote for Australia's environmental future. Consider which candidates and parties align with strong climate action, not those who might be influenced by the climate denialism present in initiatives like Project 2025.

Geopolitical Instability: The "America First" Threat to Our Security

Australia's security in the Indo-Pacific relies heavily on our alliance with the United States. Project 2025's "America First" approach could fundamentally alter this dynamic, potentially weakening US commitments to global alliances, including our own.

A key concern is the potential undermining of the U.S.-Australia defence partnership. In an increasingly complex and contested Indo-Pacific, reduced US engagement could leave Australia more vulnerable. Disruptions to US intelligence services and weakened intelligence-sharing frameworks under Project 2025 would also directly impact our ability to respond to regional security threats.

Furthermore, a reduced US global footprint could create a vacuum that other powers, like China, might exploit in our region. This would place Australia in a precarious position, forcing us to navigate a more uncertain geopolitical landscape with potentially less support from our traditional ally. Reduced American support for regional security initiatives critical to Australia's strategic interests is another worrying possibility.

Think about who you want leading Australia on the world stage. Do you want leaders who prioritise strong international alliances and regional stability, or those who might align with an isolationist "America First" agenda that could leave Australia adrift?

Economic Headwinds: Tariffs and Trade Wars

Our economy is deeply intertwined with global trade, including our relationship with the United States. Project 2025's "America First" philosophy could lead to the reintroduction or expansion of tariffs and protectionist trade policies.

We've already seen the impact of US tariffs on Australian steel and aluminium. Project 2025 could lead to even broader tariffs, potentially a universal tariff of 10–20% on all Australian exports to the US. This would severely harm Australian exporters across various sectors, including agriculture and mining, and could reduce demand for our raw materials like iron ore.

Disruptions to global trade networks caused by Project 2025's inward focus could also lead to reduced access to international markets and higher costs for imports for Australia. The unpredictable nature of these potential US trade policies could lead to "strategic dithering" in Australia's response, hindering our ability to effectively plan our economic future.

Consider the economic policies of the parties contesting the 2025 election. Who has a clear plan to navigate potential global economic instability and protect Australian jobs and businesses in the face of protectionist trends?

Echoes in Our Backyard: Australian Political Parallels

Alarmingly, the sources reveal potential parallels between Project 2025's themes and some Australian political movements. The "Trumpet of Patriots" party, led by Clive Palmer, is explicitly described as "heavily inspired" by President Trump and mirrors several aspects of Project 2025's ideology, from its "Make Australia Great Again" rhetoric to its stance on social issues and government spending.

Furthermore, the Liberal National Party (LNP) has also shown ideological alignment with some aspects of Project 2025 in their recent policy announcements, particularly regarding energy policy favouring nuclear and traditional sources, streamlining approvals for gas exploration, and reducing regulatory burdens.

It's vital to understand these connections. Are we willing to see Australian politics influenced by a US blueprint that could harm our environment, security, and economy?

Your Vote Matters: Shaping Australia's Future

The 2025 Federal election is a chance to shape Australia's future in a rapidly changing world. Understanding the potential impacts of global movements like Project 2025, and identifying which Australian political forces align with its dangerous agenda, is crucial for making an informed decision.

Consider the long-term implications for our environment, our security alliances, and our economic prosperity. Don't let external agendas dictate Australia's path. Your vote in 2025 is your voice – use it wisely to protect Australia's interests and secure a brighter future for all of us.