Project 2025: What a US Policy Blueprint Means for Your Vote in the 2025 Australian Election

 Fellow Australians, as we gear up for the 2025 Federal election, it's crucial we look beyond our shores to understand global forces that could significantly impact our lives. One such force is "Project 2025," a comprehensive policy blueprint developed by conservative organisations in the United States, spearheaded by The Heritage Foundation. While it's an American initiative, its potential flow-on effects for Australia are too significant to ignore.

Project 2025 outlines a radical conservative vision for a future US presidential administration, aiming to reshape everything from environmental regulations to international alliances. As our closest ally, the US's policy direction has a tangible impact on Australia's security, economy, and environment. Understanding Project 2025 is understanding a potential future that could directly affect your vote in 2025.

Our Environment at Risk: Project 2025's Climate Change Denial


Australia is on the front lines of climate change, facing increasing extreme weather events, rising sea levels, and threats to our beloved Great Barrier Reef Project 2025's approach to the environment is deeply concerning. It proposes a significant reversal of climate initiatives and environmental protections in the US, prioritising fossil fuel development above all else.

This isn't just a US issue; it's a global one. If the US, a major global emitter, abandons climate action, it undermines global efforts to combat climate change. This makes it harder for Australia to achieve its own climate goals and exacerbates the environmental challenges facing our Pacific neighbours.

Imagine a world where the US rolls back regulations, expands Arctic drilling, and even denies the harm caused by carbon dioxide emissions. This would weaken the international drive for ambitious climate action, leaving Australia more vulnerable to the devastating impacts of a warming planet. The potential US withdrawal from the Paris Agreement under Project 2025 would further cripple the international cooperation ..

Your vote in 2025 is a vote for Australia's environmental future. Consider which candidates and parties align with strong climate action, not those who might be influenced by the climate denialism present in initiatives like Project 2025.

Geopolitical Instability: The "America First" Threat to Our Security


Australia's security in the Indo-Pacific relies heavily on our alliance with the United States. Project 2025's "America First" approach could fundamentally alter this dynamic, potentially weakening US commitments to global alliances, including our own.

A key concern is the potential undermining of the U.S.-Australia defence partnership. In an increasingly complex and contested Indo-Pacific, reduced US engagement could leave Australia more vulnerable. Disruptions to US intelligence services and weakened intelligence-sharing frameworks under Project 2025 would also directly impact our ability to respond to regional security threats.

Furthermore, a reduced US global footprint could create a vacuum that other powers, like China, might exploit in our region. This would place Australia in a precarious position, forcing us to navigate a more uncertain geopolitical landscape with potentially less support from our traditional ally. Reduced American support for regional security initiatives critical to Australia's strategic interests is another worrying possibility.

Think about who you want leading Australia on the world stage. Do you want leaders who prioritise strong international alliances and regional stability, or those who might align with an isolationist "America First" agenda that could leave Australia adrift?

Economic Headwinds: Tariffs and Trade Wars


Our economy is deeply intertwined with global trade, including our relationship with the United States. Project 2025's "America First" philosophy could lead to the reintroduction or expansion of tariffs and protectionist trade policies.

We've already seen the impact of US tariffs on Australian steel and aluminium. Project 2025 could lead to even broader tariffs, potentially a universal tariff of 10–20% on all Australian exports to the US. This would severely harm Australian exporters across various sectors, including agriculture and mining, and could reduce demand for our raw materials like iron ore.

Disruptions to global trade networks caused by Project 2025's inward focus could also lead to reduced access to international markets and higher costs for imports for Australia. The unpredictable nature of these potential US trade policies could lead to "strategic dithering" in Australia's response, hindering our ability to effectively plan our economic future.

Consider the economic policies of the parties contesting the 2025 election. Who has a clear plan to navigate potential global economic instability and protect Australian jobs and businesses in the face of protectionist trends?

Echoes in Our Backyard: Australian Political Parallels


Alarmingly, the sources reveal potential parallels between Project 2025's themes and some Australian political movements. The "Trumpet of Patriots" party, led by Clive Palmer, is explicitly described as "heavily inspired" by President Trump and mirrors several aspects of Project 2025's ideology, from its "Make Australia Great Again" rhetoric to its stance on social issues and government spending.

Furthermore, the Liberal National Party (LNP) has also shown ideological alignment with some aspects of Project 2025 in their recent policy announcements, particularly regarding energy policy favouring nuclear and traditional sources, streamlining approvals for gas exploration, and reducing regulatory burdens.

It's vital to understand these connections. Are we willing to see Australian politics influenced by a US blueprint that could harm our environment, security, and economy?

Your Vote Matters: Shaping Australia's Future


The 2025 Federal election is a chance to shape Australia's future in a rapidly changing world. Understanding the potential impacts of global movements like Project 2025, and identifying which Australian political forces align with its dangerous agenda, is crucial for making an informed decision.
Consider the long-term implications for our environment, our security alliances, and our economic prosperity. Don't let external agendas dictate Australia's path. Your vote in 2025 is your voice – use it wisely to protect Australia's interests and secure a brighter future for all of us.



Thinking Twice Before You Vote: Can Peter Dutton Be Trusted to Lead?

 Fellow Australians, as we head towards the 2025 Federal election, we face a crucial decision about who we entrust with the future of our nation. Among those vying for your vote, Peter Dutton, the current Leader of the Opposition, presents himself as a strong and decisive leader. But before you cast your ballot, it’s vital to consider a series of serious allegations and concerns raised in recent times, documented in reports and inquiries, that cast a shadow over his suitability to lead our country.

One of the most troubling issues revolves around the case of William Betham, a convicted drug trafficker whose visa was cancelled and subsequently reinstated. It is alleged that Betham bragged about paying an $80,000 bribe to secure the return of his visa, with claims suggesting this payment was intended for Peter Dutton or his office. These are serious allegations that strike at the heart of our justice system and the integrity of our borders.

While Mr. Dutton has consistently denied any involvement or wrongdoing, the circumstances surrounding Betham's visa reinstatement have been described as "unusual, lacking transparency, and prompting allegations of corruption". Reports indicate that Betham spent an unusually short time in immigration detention before his release, and the decision to reinstate his visa was reportedly made within the Department of Home Affairs without public scrutiny. This lack of transparency in such critical decisions raises legitimate questions about potential undue influence.

Furthermore, the sources highlight broader concerns about the integrity of the Department of Home Affairs during Mr. Dutton's tenure as Minister. Significant and often inflated contracts were awarded to companies like Paladin and Canstruct for offshore detention, with these companies themselves facing investigations for bribery and other performance issues. A report by former ASIO director-general Dennis Richardson even found contractual relationships with companies under investigation for criminal activities. While these reports may not directly implicate ministerial involvement in the contract decisions, they paint a picture of a department where significant sums of taxpayer money were being managed with questionable oversight.

Beyond these core allegations, other instances have raised concerns about Mr. Dutton's conduct. These include:
Allegations of misuse of public funds for travel expenses that coincided with political fundraising events and major sporting events.
Recently surfaced allegations of insider trading from 2009 related to bank share purchases prior to a government bailout announcement, which Mr. Dutton has vehemently denied.
Unverified claims about his past in the Queensland police force and allegations of taking bribes.

The seriousness of the allegations surrounding the William Betham case led to a referral to the Australian Commission for Law Enforcement Integrity (ACLEI) for investigation. While the provided sources do not offer definitive outcomes confirming corruption on the part of Peter Dutton, the fact that these allegations were deemed serious enough for such an investigation should give voters pause.

In a healthy democracy, public trust in our leaders is paramount. The allegations detailed in these sources, particularly those concerning potential bribery and the lack of transparency in visa decisions, have significant implications for public trust in Australian politics and governance. They underscore the ongoing debate about the crucial need for greater transparency and accountability in government processes, and have amplified calls for a federal anti-corruption body or integrity commission to provide independent oversight.

As you consider who deserves your vote in the upcoming election, ask yourself: can we afford to have a leader shadowed by such serious and persistent allegations? Can we be confident in entrusting the highest office in the land to someone whose tenure in a key ministerial portfolio has been marked by questions of integrity and transparency?

These are not matters to be taken lightly. Before you vote, take the time to consider the information available, reflect on the importance of trust and integrity in our political leaders, and make an informed decision about who is best placed to lead Australia. The future of our nation depends on it.

Surely, Australia, we can pick a better elected representative?







Sources:

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/dec/04/whistleblower-lodges-complaint-about-peter-dutton-in-case-of-drug-trafficker-spared-deportation

https://www.crikey.com.au/2024/02/14/peter-dutton-home-affairs-scandal-kpmg-paladin-news-corp/

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-25/dutton-briefed-by-afp-of-bhojani-before-contract/102644618

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2025/mar/11/peter-dutton-charged-taxpayers-flights-coinciding-with-liberal-fundraisers-australian-election-2025

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2025/mar/12/peter-dutton-expense-records-public-funding-nrl-grand-final-ntwnfb

https://www.news.com.au/national/politics/youre-disgusting-absolute-chaos-on-sunrise/news-story/de91094a607ac493bb5fcce21d1478e9

https://independentaustralia.net/politics/politics-display/duttons-corrupt-link-to-drug-kingpin,12371

https://www.occrp.org/en/news/australian-minister-accused-of-cash-for-visas-bribery


Your Vote Matters: Examining the Conduct of Our Elected Officials Ahead of 2025

 As Australians prepare to head to the polls for the 2025 Federal election, it’s crucial to consider the track record and conduct of those who represent us in Parliament. This election is an opportunity to shape the future of our nation, and a well-informed vote is your most powerful tool.

One figure who has frequently been in the headlines since his election in 2022 is Senator Ralph Babet, representing the United Australia Party (UAP) for Victoria. Understanding the controversies surrounding Senator Babet is essential for all Australian voters as we consider who we want representing our values and interests in Canberra.

A Pattern of Controversial Social Media Conduct:


Senator Babet’s use of social media has been a consistent source of controversy. In November 2024, he was formally censured by the Senate for his "inflammatory use of hate speech, designed to drive division for his own political benefit". This censure followed a social media post containing offensive content, including racial and homophobic slurs. Despite widespread condemnation and calls for his resignation, Senator Babet refused to apologise, asserting his commitment to free speech.

This wasn't an isolated incident. In April 2024, Senator Babet posted a video depicting the stabbing of Bishop Mar Mari Emmanuel, which was deemed violent and inappropriate by the eSafety commissioner, who requested its removal. This raises serious questions about the kind of content we expect our elected officials to share publicly. Furthermore, in August 2024, he faced criticism for posting edited videos of committee proceedings that were considered misleading. These edits reportedly gave the "impression that witnesses were unable to answer questions, leading to threatening comments directed at officials". Such actions undermine the integrity of parliamentary processes and can have real-world consequences.

Concerns Regarding Extremist Associations:


In February 2024, a photograph emerged showing Senator Babet with a member of the National Socialist Network performing a partial Nazi salute. While Babet stated he did not know the individual and did not endorse extremist ideologies, the association understandably raised concerns. Voters deserve to know who their representatives are associating with and whether those associations align with community values.

Challenging Democratic Processes:


In November 2024, Senator Babet, alongside former UAP leader Clive Palmer, initiated a High Court challenge against certain provisions of the Commonwealth Electoral Act. These provisions prevent deregistered parties, like the UAP, from contesting elections until the next general election. Babet and Palmer argued that these laws are unconstitutional and restrict democratic participation, likening the situation to electoral practices in authoritarian regimes. This legal challenge against the fundamental rules of our electoral system is a significant action that warrants careful consideration by voters.

Questions of Ethical Conduct and Priorities:


Beyond his social media activity and associations, questions have been raised about Senator Babet’s ethical conduct and priorities. In March 2023, reports emerged that he was still working for his family's real estate business, Babet Brothers, while serving as a Senator. While he stated he was not receiving payment and intended to return to the business after his term, this "raised questions about potential conflicts of interest and the appropriate balance between public duties and private business interests".

Furthermore, Senator Babet has made contentious remarks about his parliamentary salary, describing it as a "pay cut" and insufficient for the "suffering" he would endure in parliament. These statements may strike many Australians as out of touch with the realities faced by everyday workers.

Making an Informed Choice:


As you consider your vote in the upcoming 2025 Federal election, it is vital to reflect on the conduct of our elected officials. The controversies surrounding Senator Ralph Babet, as detailed in the sources, raise important questions about the standards we expect from our parliamentary representatives.
Do these actions and statements align with your values? Do they reflect the kind of leadership you want for Australia? These are the questions every voter should ask themselves before casting their ballot. Your vote is your voice – make it count by being informed and engaged.

An example of how this Senator has acted:




Sources:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ralph_Babet

https://theconversation.com/senate-censures-lidia-thorpe-for-disupting-kings-reception-and-ralph-babet-for-posting-hate-speech-243927

https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Community_Affairs/ExcessMortality47/Report/Dissenting_Report_from_Senator_Babet_of_the_United_Australia_Party

https://www.news.com.au/technology/online/social/fringe-politician-doubles-down-on-disgusting-racist-homophobic-and-ableist-slurs/news-story/141e707deda62719e401398a2066da49

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-11-18/lidia-thorpe-and-ralph-babet-censured-by-parliament/104613292

https://www.news.com.au/national/politics/not-putins-russia-palmer-slams-unconstitutional-election-laws-amid-court-bid-to-be-included/news-story/ef7ef23892dcc19bc786cb2dc9c19524

https://www.theguardian.com/media/article/2024/sep/04/ralph-babet-wakeley-church-stabbing-post-elon-musk-x-ntwnfb

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/mar/13/united-australia-senator-ralph-babet-defends-working-for-family-real-estate-business


https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/senator-babet-dares-woke-ass-clowns-to-criticise-him-amid-foulmouthed-rant-on-social-media/news-story/b9798ce1777befe27a245d2fce61b18e

https://www.news.com.au/national/politics/not-putins-russia-palmer-slams-unconstitutional-election-laws-amid-court-bid-to-be-included/news-story/ef7ef23892dcc19bc786cb2dc9c19524

https://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/victoria/rebel-victorian-senators-lidia-thorpe-and-ralph-babet-censured-in-senate/news-story/3ee9290ebcfcd97ef9ced709e7a7f72d

https://www.couriermail.com.au/technology/online/fringe-politician-doubles-down-on-disgusting-racist-homophobic-and-ableist-slurs/news-story/141e707deda62719e401398a2066da49

Why "Boiling Point" is the Community Movement You Need for the 2025 Federal Election



The 2025 Federal Election is upon us, and with it comes a pivotal moment for Australians to shape the future of the nation. From addressing the cost-of-living crisis to tackling housing affordability and climate resilience, voters are grappling with critical questions about leadership and policy direction. Amid this landscape, Boiling Point emerges as a grassroots initiative designed to empower everyday Australians to engage politically, counter misinformation, and foster informed decision-making.

What is Boiling Point?

Boiling Point is not just another campaign; it’s a movement. Founded by Denise Shrivell, this initiative aims to create a network of politically informed Australians who can inspire their peers to become active participants in democracy. Through regular emails, members receive actionable tasks such as signing petitions, writing letters to editors, or joining advocacy groups—all designed to amplify voices and drive meaningful change.

At its core, Boiling Point champions evidence-based policies, inclusivity, equity, and transparency while opposing political corruption. It’s a call to action for those who believe in a strong democracy and want their votes—and voices—to count.

Why This Election Matters


The stakes for the 2025 Federal Election couldn’t be higher. According to recent analyses, Australians are deeply concerned about issues like:

Cost-of-living pressures: With 57% of voters identifying this as their top concern, solutions for affordability are paramount.

Housing affordability: Record-high immigration and limited housing supply have made this issue a flashpoint.

Climate resilience: As natural disasters increase in frequency, voters are demanding sustainable solutions that balance environmental goals with economic realities.

Youth engagement: Programs like Youth Parliament have shown that young Australians are eager to participate in shaping the nation’s future.

However, these challenges risk being overshadowed by populist rhetoric and short-term fixes. This is where Boiling Point steps in—to cut through the noise and ensure voters are armed with facts.

How You Can Get Involved

Joining Boiling Point is simple but impactful. By signing up, you’ll become part of a growing community dedicated to fostering informed political discourse. Here’s how you can make a difference:

Engage locally: Start conversations with friends and family about key election issues.

Take action: Participate in tasks like writing to MPs or supporting community initiatives.

Stay informed: Use Boiling Point’s resources to navigate complex policy debates with clarity.

The Power of Grassroots Movements

Movements like Boiling Point remind us that democracy thrives when citizens actively participate. Whether it’s advocating for affordable housing or pushing for net-zero policies that work for all Australians, grassroots efforts can influence political agendas in powerful ways.

As we approach election day, let’s remember that every vote matters—and so does every conversation.

By joining Boiling Point, you’re not just casting a ballot; you’re shaping the future of Australia.

Are you ready to take action? Let’s turn up the heat and make 2025 a turning point for our nation.